Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on Affirmative Action

Term Paper TitleAffirmative Action
# of Words1272
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)5.09

Affirmative Action

“The state shall not discriminate, or grant preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex,
color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.”
The previous statement is the unedited text of the operative part of Proposition 209, the California Civil Rights
Initiative (CCRI), that passed November fifth by a percentage of 54 to 46. Though the initiative does not actually
mention affirmative action, Californians feel affirmative action may be coming to an end. Will the decision of
Proposition 209 have a great impact on colleges and universities? We will soon find out. We do know that
affirmative action in colleges and universities has a long history of controversy sparked by the 1978 Bakke case and
seems to be far from over with the recent vote on proposition 209.
The Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke has been the basis for
most college affirmative action programs. The case involved a white man, Allen Bakke, who applied for admission
to, and was rejected by California University at Davis Medical School in 1973 and 1974. The university had an
affirmative action program to accept sixteen Black, Hispanic, and Asian students for every 100 entering. Allen
Bakke objected when he found out that he had been turned down while minorities students with lower college
grades and MCAT scores had been admitted under the university’s affirmative action program. The court then had
been divided between four justices in favor of admitting Bakke on the basis that the quota affirmative
Maloney 2
action plan had violated Title Four of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, four Justices against admitting Bakke, and Justice
Powell, the swing vote. Justice Powell declared
that Allen Bakke would be admitted to the medical school because the University of California’s affirmative action
plan had violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In Justice Powells opinion, the
Fourteenth Amendment must be interpreted to protect everyone (McWhirter).
The Bakke decision has sparked many anti-affirmative action movements, the latest being Proposition 209. Backing
the California Civil Rights Initiative, proponents feel it is time to end race and sex-based quotas, preferences and
set-asides now governing state employment, contracts and education. Launching a two million dollar television
campaign to support the ballot measure, Robert Dole and the Republican Party made proposition 209 the centerpiece
in their push for California’s 54 electoral votes (Lesher). Bob Dole states, “If affirmative action means quotas, set-
asides and other preferences that favor individuals simply because they happen to belong to certain groups, that’s
were I draw the line” (qtd. in “What They’re Saying About Quotas and the California Civil Rights Initiative”).
Agreeing with Dole, Governor Pete Wilson states that “Mandating and practicing inequality cannot bring equality”
(qtd. in “What They’re Saying About Quotas and the California Civil Rights !
Initiative”). Another defender of proposition 209 and affirmative action is House Speaker Newt Gingrich. In a
interview with Gingrich, he boldly states that “people who want some kind of quota based on racial background
should be forced to debate in public their version of America. I would make clear that I oppose
Maloney 3
quotas explicitly because I favor an integrated America” (qtd. in “What They’re Saying About Quotas and the
California Civil Rights Initiative”). United States Senator, Phil Gramm, also opposes affirmative action resolutely
declaring that “if I become President,
quotas and set-asides are finished in America” (qtd. in “What They’re Saying About Quotas and the California Civil
Rights Initiative”).
Opposing the measure, California college students and other affirmative action supporters protest to sustain variety
and diversity. The first incident occurred when 500 students from University of California Berkele...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: