Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on Police External Review Boards

Term Paper TitlePolice External Review Boards
# of Words1861
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)7.44

Police External Review Boards

     No police department in the country, or the world, is free from deviant officers.
Offenses can be something as minor as a department policy infraction such as being out of
uniform or as major as a criminal violation such as assault.  Since the earliest police
departments were formed, society has tried to find a way to “police the police”.  Today,
this is done through internal affairs or a similar office inside the department and civilian
review boards which are independent from the police.

     Each department has some way to discipline those officers who find themselves on the
other side of the law.  The decision to suspend an officer, or to take any other action
against them, can come form the chief or a board of officers.  Complaints may come form
citizens, fellow officers, or from superiors.  Most small departments will leave the handling
of these complaints to the chief or the commissioner’s discretion.  Larger departments
usually will have some type of review board to handle complaints.  These boards would be
made up of a number of officers and supervisors, and have the ability to conduct
investigations, hold hearings and pass disciplinary decisions.  Some boards may work as an
advisorial group to the chief, who would have final decisions.  This is one of today’s most
widely used ways to keep law enforcement officer in check.  In his article, Herman
Goldstein points out that:
          
          However strongly committed an agency may be to disciplining the conduct of its employees, it is not      
          likely to criticize the actions of an officer which, though of questionable legality, are in accord with
          a practice knowingly and consciously engaged in by the agency.  This suggests that department-
          wide policies, as distinct from the individual conduct of police officers, can be adequately            
          controlled only from outside a police department (1967, p.164).

     This now raises questions as to an internal board’s ability to stop police misconduct.  In
comparing the Police Advisory Board (external) and the Police Board of Inquiry (internal)
for the city of Philadelphia, James Hudson points that the board of inquiry works best
when “directed inward toward the police organization (1972, 429)”, meaning it should
deal with policy violation within the department, not complaints from citizens.

     External review is now shown as a necessary measure.  Boards are made up of
interested citizens who advise the mayor on police discipline matters.  James Hudson,
when writing about the Philadelphia Police Advisory Board, defines it’s task as,
“...improving police-community relations on the basis of citizen complaints and, more
narrowly, to assist the citizen in a resolution of this problem.”  The review boards are
structured differently from department to department in their organization and authority,
but all have the same basic goal.

     External Review has not been used or studied long enough to say that there is an exact
science to it. As with any other issue, different parts of society view these boards’ tasks
differently.  Most boards have the same general structure.  Civilians appointed by the
mayor, or other governmental official, sit on the board, usually in an unpaid capacity.
Some boards have an executive director or secretary who is compensated.  The boards
also have a varying degree of power and authority.  Some act in a mere advisory capacity,
while others have final say in major decisions.
     The weakest model of external review boards they act only as a watchdog of the
department’s internal review system.

        While one still has police officers conduction the investigations, and senior officers ultimately    
          determining and imposing discipline, there is an organizationally distinct civilian agency
          monitoring the police disposition of public complaints (Goldsmith, 1988, p.64).

      This type of system involves citizens, but has serious limitati...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: