| Term Papers Count: 63,000 | ||
| Home | Join | Login | Logout | Forgot Password | FAQ | Contact | ||
|
| ||
Term Papers on Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species Act The people who make laws and regulation, and create management plans, concerning old growth forests and factors affecting old growth forests, are the policy makers. Persons involved in creating policies and management plans are politicians, committees, and federal and state government agencies. There are many beliefs held by policy makers concerning the northern spotted owl, because the policy makers are supporting the environmentalists, logging industry, the public, interest groups, and citizens. Politicians opinions also vary due to the diversity of opinion between the voters of each state, whom the politicians represent. This portion of the paper will discuss the statements and arguments made by policy makers concerning the northern spotted owl and old growth forest. A major point that is argued, concerning the owls and the old growth forest, is that since old growth forests are rapidly being cut, that the owls will soon not have any habitat left. The Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. =A7 1532, ESA =A7 3 (19)) states that endangered species cannot be "harmed", and 50 C.F.R. =A7 17.3 states that "harm" could be considered as habitat modification. This makes harvesting practices very difficult to do on old growth forests, because by destroying habitat, "harm" is being done. The Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management are required by the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA), the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act (MUSY), and the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), to protect endangered species, but timber industries are not regulated by these acts. Therefore, the ESA is needed where the NEPA, MUSY, and NFMA do not regulate harvesting practices on private lands. The Subcommittee on Environmental Protection, a committee of US senators, was formed to solve the spotted owl/old growth forest issue. Most of the committee members supported the ESA, but they do not all support it the same way. They all stated that the ESA is a good act, but the act needs to be revised. See Table 1. Table 1. Positions of State Senators Concerning the Northern Spotted Owl 1 Senator State Is the owl to blame How should the ESA Representing for job losses? be handled? _______________________________________________________________ Mark Approves ESA but ESA Hatfield Oregon Yes should be revised Robert Approves ESA but ESA Packwood Oregon Yes should be revised Slade Approves ESA but ESA Gorton Washington Yes should be revised Brock Approves ESA but ESA Adams Washington Yes/No should be revised Max Approves ESA but ESA Baucus Montana No should be revised Steve Approves ESA but ESA Symms Idaho Yes should be revised George Approves ESA but ESA Mitchell Maine No should be revised John Approves ESA but ESA Chafee Rhode Island No should be revised Joseph Approves ESA but ESA Lieberman Connecticut No should be revised 1Based on statements made by members of the Subcommittee on Environmental Protection (US Government Printing Office 1992) The majority felt that one of the main problems with the act was the problem with how listings should be dealt with. Currently, species are usually listed without regard to human needs, or economics. Another problem is that some species listed as threatened or endangered are actually subspecies of a primary species. One example is the northern spotted owl which is a subspecies of the spotted owl species. Senator Steve Symms of Idaho said the ESA should be renamed the "Geographically Specific Sub-population Act" (US Government Printing Office 1992). Senator Steve Symms also stated that few species have been delisted since the ESA was enacted. Many argue that recovery of most endangered species is difficult or impossible. Yet the Fish and Wildlife Service ... This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now! Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation! Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!
|
|
Copyright 1998-2007 Digital Term Papers. All Rights Reserved.
Forgot Password
Cancel Account
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Contact Us
Essay List: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 |