| Home | FAQ | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us | ||||
|
||||
|
Term Paper Categories
American HistoryAnatomy Physiology Animal Science Anthropology Architecture Arts Astronomy Aviation Beauty Biographies Book Reports Business Computers Creative Writing Current Events Economics Education Engineering English Environmental Ethics European History Foreign Languages Geography Government Politics Health History Human Sexuality Legal Issues Marketing Mathematics Medicine Miscellaneous Movies Television Music Mythology Philosophy Physics Poetry Political Science Psychology Religion Science Shakespeare Social Issues Sociology Speech Sports Recreation Supernatural Technology Theater Zoology |
Social Deviance
Social Deviance Social deviance is a term that refers to forms of behaviour and qualities of persons that others in society devalue and discredit. So what exactly is deviance? In this particular essay we are concerned with social deviance. Not physiological deviations from the expected norm. In general, any behaviour that does not conform to social norms is deviance. That is behaviour that violates significant social norms and is disapproved of by a large number of people as a result. For societies to run with some semblance of order the problem of deviance is essential and intrinsic to any conception of social order. It is problematic because it causes a disruption, but it is essential because it defines our boundaries as a society. It is intrinsic to a conception of order in that defining what is real and expected, defining what is acceptable, and defining who we are - always done in opposition to what is unreal, unexpected, unacceptable and who we are not. If we can accept the reality of change, then designations of deviance are crucial in locating the shifting boundaries of our socially structured reality. (Erikson, 1964) What is perceived as deviant behaviour is subject to change depending on our position, place and time. Different cultures have different levels of social order and control, therefore making what can be seen as a deviant behaviour in one culture highly acceptable in another. When we define someone or some group as deviant - we strengthen our own position and simplify our response to the "other": we can ignore, expunge, destroy, or rehabilitate them. We convince ourselves of our own normalcy by condemning and controlling those who disagree. Deviance is a phenomenon situated in power: Winners are the good and the normal; Losers are the sick, the crazy, the evil. Deviance, therefore exists in opposition to those who attempt to control it - to those who have power. (Phofl, 1994) Deviance is not a matter of the cost or consequences of a particular behaviour, or the behaviour itself. Deviance is a label used to maintain the power, control, and position of a dominant group. It is a negotiated order. Deviance violates some groups assumptions about reality (social order). It violates expectations. The definition of deviance defines the threat and allows for containment and control of the threat. The definition of deviance preserves, protects, and defines group interests and in doing so maintains a sense of normalcy. It is a product of social interaction. (Erikson 1964) Sociologists have said that deviance is a social reality, that it is shared and learned like any aspect of culture. Emile Durkheim and other functionalists posed the notion that deviance is functional. He asserted that: 1. Deviance acts as a safety valve 2. Deviance inspires creativity 3. Deviance creates social change 4. Deviance outlines boundaries and rules 5. Deviance can promote social solidarity. (Haralambos, Holborn,van Krieken, Smith, 1996) Chicago school sociologists believed that any region that was physically separated from the others was viewed as a natural area. Within each of these areas are moral, social and structural orders. That is, a set of customs, rules, or regulations that control the process of competition and cooperation. Theorists of the Chicago school believed that deviance resulted from disorganised areas (which they believed would be characterised with physical deterioration, economic deprivation, poverty, racial and ethnic heterogeneity, turnover, alienation, high rate of suicide.). The weak community integration led to the formation of and higher rates of deviance. Overtime these theorists backed away from the idea that these areas are disorganised and instead argued that they were differently organised. Deviance was a by-product of different social org... This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now! Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation! Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!
|
| Copyright 1998-2008 Digital Term Papers. All Rights Reserved. Home FAQ Forgot Password Cancel Account Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact Us |