Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on THE FALLACIES OF PAT BUCHANANS ECONOMICS

Term Paper TitleTHE FALLACIES OF PAT BUCHANANS ECONOMICS
# of Words3182
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)12.73

THE FALLACIES OF PAT BUCHANAN'S ECONOMICS

Pat Buchanan is currently campaigning to become the Republican representative in the next U.S.
Presidential election.  He is credited with striking a chord amongst the main stream, blue collar sector
of the country.  This is because he has based his economic platform on common myths about free trade and
how it is the cause of the economic problems in the U.S.  His theme is that layoffs and the closing of
American plants are the result of foreign companies and countries taking advantage of easy access into
U.S. markets which, in his opinion, is not being reciprocated abroad.  This is how he accounts for the
current trade deficit that the U.S. is running with countries like Japan.  Pat's economic platform
regarding trade policy can be summarized as follows:
*     Impose a 10% tariff on Japanese imports and a 20% tariff on Chinese imports.  This would
generate, in his opinion, $20 billion in government revenue and reduce the trade deficit which could be
reinvested into the American economy and help create tax cuts for small businesses.
*     Impose a social tariff on Third World manufactured goods to protect U.S. workers' wage rates from
the foreign laborers who are paid a fraction of what their U.S. counterparts earn.  He also resents that
foreign companies do not have to adhere to the strict environmental, safety, and health standards that
American firms do yet get free access to the U.S. market via GATT and NAFTA.
It is evident that Pat Buchanan believes that trade deficits and trade with Third World countries are at
the heart of what he perceives to be America's economic problems.  He feels that through tariffs the
burden of income taxes paid by U.S. workers and small businesses can be shifted onto consumers who
purchase foreign goods.  His underlying sentiment about his trade restrictive policies is, "This is our
land; America is our country; the U.S. our market.  We decide who enters here and who does not."

The basis of international trade is that their are gains to be had from partaking in it.  This was proven
by David Ricardo, an economist in the early 19th century, who introduced the concept of comparative
advantage.  His theory stated that a country's "absolute advantage (overall productivity differences
between countries) should be reflected in differences in income, whereas comparative advantage
(variations in productivity differences by sector) will determine the pattern of international trade."
A common misconception about free trade is that it is based on absolute advantage.  Comparative advantage
always is applicable when applied to international trade so it stands to reason that there will always be
gains from trade.  The existence of low wages in a country is not by itself a reason for the U.S. to fear
trading with them.  For one thing, wages generally reflect the productivity levels of workers.  If low
wages meant low costs then world trade would be dominated by Th!
ird World countries and the U.S. would never export.  The fact is that differences in technology cause
labor productivity variances between countries which affects unit labor costs.  A firm will tend to hire
more workers until the value of the product that the last worker produces is equal to the cost of that
worker.  In the less developed countries low productivity, as a result of low levels of technology, is
reflected in wages.  The significant measure to determine which sectors a country has a comparative
advantage is not wages, but unit labor costs.  A country can have a comparative advantage in a sector
even if it is more inefficient than any other country.  This is because comparative advantage is based
not on who is the best, but rather on where a country's "margin of superiority is greater, or its margin
of inferiority smaller".   As long as a poor country specializes in sectors where it is the least
inefficient compared to a rich country then it will gain from trade.

The Ricardian Model, based on differences in labor productivity, is best explained usin...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: