Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on The Dred Scott Decision

Term Paper TitleThe Dred Scott Decision
# of Words2432
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)9.73

The Dred Scott Decision

The Dred Scott decision of the Supreme Court in March 1857 was one of the major steps
on the road to secession. Dred Scott was a slave who was taken to Missouri from Virginia
and sold. His new master then moved to Illinois (a free state) for a while but soon moved
back to Missouri. Upon his master's death, Scott claimed that since he had resided in a free
state, he was consequentially a free man. The case eventually made it to the Supreme
Court.

As stated by Supreme Court Justice C. J. Taney, "In considering this...controversy, two
questions arise: 1st.[sic] Was [Scott], together with his family, free in Missouri by reason
of his stay in the territory of the United States hereinbefore mentioned? And 2d[sic], If
they were not, is Scott himself free by reason of his removal to Rock Island, in the state of
Illinois...?" Both of these questions led to an even greater and more central question: "Can
a negro, whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a
member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution
of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and priveledges, and
immunities, guarantied by that instrument to the citizen?" (i.e. does Scott, having been a
slave, have the constitutional right to sue?)

The Court's decision (7 against, 2 for) was declared on March 6, 1857. Due to the variance
of opinions on why the Court decided as they did (all seven justices who decided against
Scott wrote opinion papers for the case), the opinion of Justice Taney is generally cited for
the majority. According to Taney, the Court decided that Scott (and hence all negro slaves
or their descendants) was not a citizen of the United States or the state of Missouri, and
thus not entitled to sue in the federal courts. Justice Taney then went beyond this point and
ruled on the entire issue of slavery in federal territories, claiming that slaves were property
and therefore the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.

Most people, whether for or against the decision, viewed it as a political decision and not a
legal one. For the first timne since Marbury vs. Madison in 1803 (and only the second time
ever) the Supreme Court declared an act of Congress [the Missouri Compromise] null and
void. The decision also lowered the Court's prestige in the North and widened the sectional
cleavage by moving Southerners from the position that slavery could not be kept out of the
territories to the assertion that it must be protected in them.

This information comes from "Dred Scott," By Robert J. Steamer, Academic American
Encyclopedia. Grolier Electronic Publishing, Danbury, 1995.


The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
held that a black slave could not become a citizen under the U.S. Constitution.

Dred Scott (c.1795-1858), a slave in Missouri, had been taken by his owner, John
Emerson, into Illinois, where slavery had been prohibited by the Northwest Ordinance of
1787, and into the Louisiana Territory, where slavery was forbidden by the MISSOURI
COMPROMISE.

After his return to Missouri, Scott brought suit (1846) against Emerson's widow, claiming
that he was free by reason of his residence in free territory. The Missouri supreme court
ruled against him, but after his ownership was transferred to Mrs. Emerson's brother, John
F. A. Sanford (the name was misspelled in legal records) of New York, Scott brought a
similar suit in federal court. The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) held that a black slave could not become a citizen under the
U.S. Constitution based on that Scott had not become free by virtue of his residence in a
territory covered by the Missouri Compromise, since that legislation was unconstitutional.

This was viewed as a proslavery decision by the abolitionists, and the case probably
hastened the coming of the Civil War. That issue aside, it was the second time that the
C...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: