Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on International Relations

Term Paper TitleInternational Relations
# of Words2489
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)9.96

International Relations


The study of international relations has been a contested ground for many decades.  A specific indication of this would be explaining or understanding the nature or knowledge of the world.  Many theorists from different schools of thought since the 1930’s have debated the contributions made among themselves.  The main terminology here initially is the epistemology or ontology of the research among international relations theorists, much confined within the boundaries of social research either scientific or non-scientific, objective or subjective.


Fundamentally, theories in international relations are either foundational or anti foundational, explanatory or constitutive. Therefore, as a researcher you either fall under the positivist framework of research or the post positivist framework in research.  Both of the aforementioned frameworks have been at odds with each other since the birth of research in international relations. In relation to the validity and warrantable acceptability of knowledge that constitutes to the focus.  The focus is obviously explaining or understanding international relations.  The scale has two ends just as there is a scale among states, democratic on one end and on the other anarchy.  The placement of a state on such a scale is dependent upon the domestic and foreign policy, most presently speaking.


There has been much debate between positivist theorists among themselves as Rationalists and Post Positivist theorists as Reflectivist also among themselves, both still existent today.  But in the present day there seems to be a new theory that intends to ‘bridge the gap’.  Known as Social Constructivism. Using theoretical frameworks and methodology from both sides.  Very rationalist in its ways and not very cosy with Reflectivist, though it has been said that this theory has become prevalent.  On the grounds that European integration seems to be the best place to test it.  Bearing in mind it is a very new theory and it requires some refining and much more contributions in respect of knowledge.


Thus far, IR terminology has occurred very often and I intend to clarify this in detail.  But more importantly tackle the focus on what contributions, social constructivism has made to the study international relations?


IR scholars wish to be exempt from the extreme methodological debate and have introduced ‘middle ground’.  This is found in the attempt to introduce Social constructivism as it has already been contained in a definition of sociology by Max Weber (1964:88) ‘A science which attempts the interpretive understanding of social action in order to arrive at a casual explanation of it’s course and effects.’  However, Social constructivism, it has been said needs to show more to be accepted as the middle ground in researching social phenomena.


I intend to define the difference in position between two methodological positions Positivism and Post Positivism with the relevance of epistemology and ontology and other related terminology in the research of social phenomena. This will then illustrate the introduction of social constructivism and it’s relevance and the contribution it has made to the study of social phenomena in international relations.


Positivism is the most influential school of thought; scientific methods are used to conduct investigations and research in international relations.  Using empirical data for introducing theories, the epistemology and ontology is explaining objectively.  Dominant theories such as Realism and Pluralism have come from the work of scholars under the positivist’s school of thought.  Both, of which are rational theories and very constitutive to international relations.  There are many sub theories under the category of Realism and Pluralism; this has given rise to much debate among rationalists recently.  Most recognised as the inter paradigm debate of Neo-Realists and Neo-Liberalists.  The neo-neo debate is very modern as these are the refined theories of the traditional Realist and Liberalist theories.  Th...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: