Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on Feminist Revolution

Term Paper TitleFeminist Revolution
# of Words3445
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)13.78

Feminist Revolution


In the latter half of this century while the New Right has managed to remain unified, organized and focused the Left’s major weakness has been that it has been anything but; in fact it is difficult to ascertain whether the Left hold any shared tenets. There seems to be the vague understanding that left-wing politics are associated with being pro-woman, pro-labor and anti-racist; however even these extremely general sentiments are often confused and mistakenly conflicted.1 Feminists in particular agree on very little; that we are pro-woman seems to be the only consensus, yet still writers often drop phrases such as “feminist politics” as if there actually existed some agreed upon feminist manifesto. This paper will examine one branch of feminist thought that has all but disappeared, the branch of radical feminism as articulated by Shulamith Firestone that placed the development of reproductive technology as the primary agent of true women’s liberation. Also explored will be the other end of the spectrum of feminist thought, feminists of the reproductive rights movement such as Robyn Rowland, who are highly suspicious of the development of reproductive technology and the potentially unethical and anti-woman ends to which it may be put to use.


Shulamith Firestone: A Case for Feminist Revolution


            Firestone’s theory essentially combines the Marxist model of political economics with Freud’s theory of psychosexual development. Borrowing from Marx’s concept of the dialectic of class, she entitles her book “The Dialectic of Sex” because she believes that it is the division of roles based on sex and the ensuing struggle between sexual classes that is at the origins of all other class distinctions. Socialist analyses are insufficient she claims, because while Marx and Engels were ingenious in their analyses of class struggle and power, they were limited in the scope of their vision. Of Engels she says, “there is a whole sexual substratum of the historical dialectic that Engels at times dimly perceives, but because he can see sexuality only through an economic filter, reducing everything to that, he is unable to evaluate it in its own right.”2 That is, socialist analyses of women’s oppression see women as a class, oppressed by their distinct economic relationship to society (i.e. to the means of production), from which follows it that, should that relationship change, women’s situation will be enabled to change.


Unlike Marx and Engels, Freud’s primary contribution was that he was able to intuit the importance of sexuality and sex roles in human behavior. She holds that Freud made many important discoveries about psychology and identity development within patriarchal nuclear families but his main shortcoming was that he was, sadly, a chauvinist. While he perceived the process of women’s oppressive socialization under patriarchy he never did actually question the patriarchal structure or the legitimacy of the patriarchal nuclear family itself. Says Firestone, he


“ . . . observed psychological structures without ever questioning their social context.”3


            For Firestone’s conclusions to make sense there are two premises one must accept. The first and perhaps most controversial is that women’s reproductive biology is the basis of our oppression. Superficially this borders on putting her in the same camp with the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. However her argument is definitely not headed in that direction. She claims that women and men were created biologically differently, and, while “ . . . this difference of itself did not necessitate the development of a class system . . . the reproductive functions of these differences did.”4 To argue this premise she highlights four fundamental facts by which the biological family (the basic reproductive unit of male/female/infant) is characterized:


1) That women throughout history before the advent of birth control were at the continual mercy of their biology . . . [pregnancy, etc.] . . . which...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: