Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on Anthropology

Term Paper TitleAnthropology
# of Words3003
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)12.01

Anthropology


Anth 174


Candomble is a branch of Santeria, an Afro-Carribbean religion which evolved among African slaves from the Yoruba religion. Historically, when slaves were brought to the Caribbean they were forced to take on the religion of their masters; in the Caribbean and South America it was predominantly Roman Catholic. Yoruban decedents kept their religion alive in part by continuing to worship the African deities in the guise of Christian saints; from this tradition evolved Voodoo in Haiti, Macumba in Brazil and Candomble in Brazil and along the Northern Coasts of South America. In Brazil today, police still raid Candomble ceremonies and until recently Candomble celebrants were required to obtain permits. However in a country that is 90 percent Roman Catholic many of the faithful attend both Candomble ceremonies and Catholic mass. Currently a movement for social and political acceptance is forming in Bahia, the state with Brazil’s highest percentage of African-Brazilians. This movement needs to be documented and would make a highly intriguing subject of an ethnographic film.


The film I would be interested in making may sound more like a documentary than an ethnographic film; typically when people think of ethnographic films images of peculiar-looking, half-naked “primitive” people come to mind. However few cultures still exist totally untouched by the 19th and 20th century phenomena of colonization and economic globalization. The questions then arise: what is legitimate as the subject of an ethnographic film, and what is acceptable in ethnographic film making?


In (creatively titled) Ethnographic Film, Karl G. Heider attempts to answer these questions, but first attempts to clarify and create a framework for what the questions should be. Heider suggests that instead of trying to squarely categorize films as ethnographic or un-ethnographic, critics and anthropologists should judge films based on their ethnographic merit. That is, if ethnography is a way of making a detailed description and analysis of human behaviors and cultures, films should be judged on how successfully they achieve these ends. Heider outlines several attributes, or scales, of ethnographicness in film; here I will discuss five films, their relation to some of Heider’s attributes and their overall success in serving an ethnographic purpose.


Nanook of the North (1922)


The first important thing to understand about Nanook is that Robert Flaherty’s intended audience was a general theater and he probably did not foresee that it would one day be shown almost exclusively in classrooms. That said, we may then evaluate the film from an ethnographic perspective, keeping in mind that a judgment of the film’s ethnographic merit is not the same as and bears no relation to a judgment of the film itself as good or bad.


Heider articulates the concept of ethnographic basis as an attribute of ethnographic film. Ethnographic basis according to him is the most important attribute determining a film’s ethnographicness and is defined as the degree to which a film is informed by ethnographic or anthropological understanding (p. 105). Robert Flaherty had no training in anthropology or ethnography, so it would seem that the degree to which Nanook was informed by ethnographic understanding must have been minimal. Amazingly though the way the film turned out overall would not point to that conclusion; several ethnographic principles are apparent throughout, and in fact in Nanook Flaherty actually set the precedent for many later ethnographic films.


Nanook of the North has been criticized on several ethnographic grounds. First, the film can be criticized for its use of staged behavior. Not only was the behavior of the subjects not spontaneous, but the entire story line was fictional; the familial relationships described were fabricated and the events were all acted out. Heider suggests that staged behavior should not be written off too quickly as un-ethnographic; instead the conditions surrounding it should be investigated (p. 5...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: