Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on Diversity Within English

Term Paper TitleDiversity Within English
# of Words1441
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)5.76

Diversity Within English

     In order to understand how language variation descriptors are used, we first must understand what language
variation is.  We can say that the U.S. is linguistically diverse because of the multitude of languages spoken here,
but we can also find diversity within these languages.  All languages have both dialectical variations and registral
variations.  These variations, or dialects, can differ in lexicon, phonology, and/or syntax from the Standard
Language that we often think of as Ścorrect¹ Language, although they are not necessarily less proper than, say,
Standard English.  It depends on where, by whom, and in what situation the dialect is used as to whether or not it
is appropriate.
          Most people are familiar with regional dialects, such as Boston, Brooklyn, or Southern.  These types of
variations usually occur because of immigration and settlement patterns.  People tend to seek out others like
themselves.  Regional variations tend to become more pronounced as the speech community is more isolated by
physical geography, i.e. mountain ranges, rivers.  Linguists have done extensive studies on regional dialects,
producing detailed Linguistic Atlases.  Many linguists can tell where a person is from just by knowing whether a
person carries groceries home from the supermarket in a paper bag or from the grocery store in a paper sack (Yule
184).  And the person who comes home from the supermarket with a paper sack serves to remind us that
language variation is not a discrete, but rather a continuous variable.  Characteristics of the dialect are more
pronounced in the center of the speech community and tend to be less discernible at the outer boundaries, where
they often overlap other regional dialects.
          Within, and between, these regional variations we find the social dialects.  The primary social factors that
influence dialects are class, education, occupation, ethnicity, sex, and age (Ferguson 52, Yule 191).  And social
dialects can vary on any or all three descriptor levels; syntax or grammar, lexicon or vocabulary, and phonetics or
pronunciation.  Social dialects are also where the described differences  are often defined as stigmatized or
nonstigmatized (Ferguson 52).  Stigmatized items include use of the double negative (grammar), substituting the d
sound for the leading th and losing sounds like the middle r and the final g in ing (pronunciation), and stylistic
choices such as puke for vomit (vocabulary).  
          There are three main types of reactions to these socially significant items.
          1.  Social indicators - the speaker, and often the listener, is not aware that these items are socially
significant in revealing one¹s social status, so the speaker makes no attempt to avoid them when speaking in a
more formal style.  This would be someone who wants to take your picture, rather than your photograph.    
          2.  Social markers - the speaker is sensitive to these items and will avoid them in a more formal style of
speech, although the speaker may not be fully aware of why.  Examples would be avoiding contractions, and
phrases like gonna or didja.  Social markers are much more prevalent in American English than social indicators.
          3.  Social stereotypes - even speakers who regularly use these types of dialects are fully aware of the stigma
attached to them.  Social stereotypes would include the copula deletion in Black English, and the loosing of sounds
a la Joe Pesci that produce phrases such as doze tree guys.
          Closely related to these social class factors are education and occupation.  While occupations often
produce their own jargons, a person¹s occupation will also determine what style of speech is used.  A lawyer and a
laborer would not be likely to use the same dialect on the job.  Likewise, a person with little education is not likely
to use the same style of speech as a college professor.  This does not imply that the lawyer and college prof...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: