Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on Rise Of The Superpowers

Term Paper TitleRise Of The Superpowers
# of Words3952
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)15.81

Rise Of The Superpowers

It is often wondered how the superpowers achieved their position of
dominance.  It seems that the  maturing of the two superpowers, Russia
and the United States, can be traced to World War II.  To be a
superpower, a nation needs to have a strong economy, an overpowering
military, immense international political power and, related to this, a
strong national ideology.  It was this war, and its results, that caused
each of these superpowers to experience such a preponderance of power.
Before the war, both nations were fit to be described as great powers,
but it would be erroneous to say that they were superpowers at that
point.  
To understand how the second World War impacted these nations so
greatly, we must examine the causes of the war.    The United States
gained its strength in world affairs from its status as an economic
power.   In the years before the war, America was the world’s largest
producer.  In the USSR at the same time, Stalin was implementing his
‘five year plans’ to modernise the Soviet economy.  From these
situations, similar foreign policies resulted from widely divergent
origins.  
Roosevelt’s isolationism emerged from the wide and prevalent domestic
desire to remain neutral in any international conflicts.  It commonly
widely believed that Americans entered the first World War simply in
order to save industry’s capitalist investments in Europe.  Whether this
is the case or not, Roosevelt was forced to work with an inherently
isolationist Congress, only expanding its horizons after the bombing of
Pearl Harbour.   He signed the Neutrality Act of 1935, making it illegal
for the United States to ship arms to the belligerents of any conflict.
The act also stated that belligerents could buy only non-armaments from
the US, and even these were only to be bought with cash.  
In contrast, Stalin was by necessity interested in European affairs, but
only to the point of concern to the USSR.  Russian foreign policy was
fundamentally Leninist in its concern to keep the USSR out of war.  
Stalin wanted to consolidate Communist power and modernise the country's
industry.  The Soviet Union was committed to collective action for
peace, as long as that commitment did not mean that the Soviet Union
would take a brunt of a Nazi attack as a result.  Examples of this can
be seen in the Soviet Unions’ attempts to achieve a mutual assistance
treaty with Britain and France.  These treaties, however, were designed
more to create security for the West, as opposed to keeping all three
signatories from harm.   At the same time, Stalin was attempting to
polarise both the Anglo-French, and the Axis powers against each other.
The important result of this was the Nazi-Soviet non-aggression pact,
which partitioned Poland, and allowed Hitler to start the war.  Another
side-effect of his policy of playing both sides was that it caused
incredible distrust towards the Soviets from the Western powers after
1940.  This was due in part to the fact that Stalin made several demands
for both influence in the Dardanelles, and for Bulgaria to be recognised
as a Soviet dependant.  
The seeds of superpowerdom lie here however, in the late thirties.  R.J.
Overy has written that “stability in Europe might have been achieved
through the existence of powers so strong that they could impose their
will on the whole of the international system, as has been the case
since 1945….”   At the time, there was no power in the world that could
achieve such a feat.  Britain and France were in imperial decline, and
more concerned about colonial economics than the stability of Europe.
Both imperial powers assumed that empire-building would necessarily be
an inevitable feature of the world system.   German aggression could
have been stifled early had the imperial powers had acted in concert.
The memories of World War One however, were too powerful, and the
general public would not condone a military solution at that point....

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: