Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on John Locke: Property Rights

Term Paper TitleJohn Locke: Property Rights
# of Words1909
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)7.64

John Locke: Property Rights


        Perhaps one of, if not the, most historically influential political
thinkers of the western world was John Locke.  John Locke, the man who initiated
what is now known as British Empiricism, is also considered highly influential
in establishing grounds, theoretically at least, for the constitution of the
United States of America.   The basis for understanding Locke is that he sees
all people as having natural God given rights.  As God's creations,  this
denotes a certain equality, at least in an abstract sense.  This religious back
drop acts as a the foundation for all of Locke's theories, including his
theories of individuality, private property, and the state.  The reader will be
shown how and why people have a natural right to property and  the impact this
has on the sovereign, as well as the extent of this impact.
     Locke was a micro based ideologist.  He believed that humans were
autonomous individuals who, although lived in a social setting, could not be
articulated as a herd or social animal.  Locke believed person to stand for,
“... a thinking, intelligent being, that has
reason and reflection, and can consider itself as itself, the same thinking
thing in different times and places, which it only does by that consciousness
which is inseparable  from thinking.”   This ability to reflect, think, and
reason intelligibly is one of the many gifts from God and is that gift which
separates us from the realm of the beast.    The ability to reason and reflect,
although universal, acts as an explanation for individuality.  All reason and
reflection is based on personal experience and  reference.  Personal experience
must be completely individual as no one can experience anything quite the same
as another.
     This leads to determining why Locke  theorized that all humans, speaking
patriarchially with respect to the time “why all men,” have a natural right to
property.  Every man is a creation of God's, and as such is endowed with certain
individual abilities and characteristics as gifts from God.   Not being able to
know God's exact wishes for man, Locke believed that all men have an obligation
to develop and caress these gifts. In essence, each man was in charge of his own
body and what was done with his body.  Of course, for Locke, each man would do
the reasonable thing and develop his natural skills and potentials to the best
of his abilities, in the service of God.
     The belief in God given abilities and the obligations that follow are
not totally deterministic.  Man, endowed with reason, could choose not to
develop these abilities.  Having the ability to choose the development of his
potential, each man is responsible for that potential and consequently is
responsible for his own body.  The development, or lack therein, is a
consequence of individual motivation and is manifested through labor.
     In keeping with the theory of one's body is one's own, a man's property
can be explained in terms of the quantifying forces of his labors. Physical
labor or exercisation of his mind, to produce  fruits for this person's labor,
is then his own property.  Locke believed that one did not need the consent of a
sovereign, as far as property was concerned, because  it is the  melding of
labor and nature that makes anything owned.     Yolton articulates this when he
states, “(b)y mixing my work, my energy with some object, (nature), I
particulise that object, it's commonness becomes particular”       Locke believed
that as long as there was plenty for others, consent was pointless, irrelevant
and would merely be an overzealous exercision of power.  Pointless because as
long as there was more for others in the common store, one was not infringing on
another's natural rights.  Irrelevant because property production or the use of
labor was completely individualistic and one should not be able to control
another's labor as it is an infringement on their natural rights.
     There are however limits, as far as property and labor are concerned.
One limit is th...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: