Digital Term Papers Term Papers Count: 63,000
    Home     |     Join     |     Login     |     Logout     |     Forgot Password     |     FAQ     |     Contact
Search
   for:      
Term Paper Categories
American History
Anatomy
Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Beauty
Biographies
Book Reports
Business
Computers
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental
Ethics
European History
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Politics
Health
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Miscellaneous
Movies
Television
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech
Sports
Recreation
Supernatural
Technology
Theater
Zoology

Term Papers on The Communication Decency Act: The Fight For Freedom Of Speech On The Internet

Term Paper TitleThe Communication Decency Act: The Fight For Freedom Of Speech On The Internet
# of Words1719
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)6.88

The Communication Decency Act: The Fight For Freedom of Speech on the Internet


     The Communication Decency Act is a bill which has insulted our right as
American citizens.  It a bill which SHOULD not pass.  I'll share with you how
Internet users are reacting to this bill, and why they say it is
unconstitutional.
     Some individuals disagree with one part of the bill.  According to
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ query/z?c104:s.652.enr:, which has the
Communications Decency Act on-line for public viewing,:  "Whoever uses an
Internet service to send to a person or persons under 18 years of age......any
comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image,........or anything offensive as
measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or
organs.....shall be fined $250,000  if the person(s) is/are under 18.......
imprisoned not more than two years.......or both."
     The wording of that section seems sensible.  However, if this one little
paragraph is approved, many sites such as the: Venus de Milo site located at:
http://www.paris.org/Musees/Louvre/Treasures/gifs/venusdemilo.gif; the Sistine
Chapel at:
http://www.oir.ucf.edu/wm/paint/auth/michelangelo/michelangelo.creation and
Michelangelo's David @ http://fileroom.aaup.uic.edu/FileRoom/images/image201.gif
could not be accessed and used by anybody under the age of 18.  These works of
art and many other museum pictures would not be available.  The bill says these
sites show indecent pictures.
     The next part of the CDA has everybody in a big legal fit. We, concerned
Internet users, took the writers of this bill to court, and we won.
     This part of the bill states: "Whoever....makes, creates, or
solicits...........any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other
communication which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or indecent.......with
intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass another person......by means of an
Internet page..........shall be fined $250,000 under title 18......imprisoned
not more than two years....or both......"
     The writer of that paragraph of the bill forgot something.   It violates
the constitution.  The First Amendment states: "Congress shall make no
law....prohibiting or abridging the freedom of speech......the right of the
people peaceably to assemble.....and to petition the Government.............."
     This bill does exactly that.  It says we cannot express our feelings
cleanly.  I understand that what may be of interest to me, may be offensive to
others.  Many people put up warning signs on their websites stating,  "This site
may contain offensive material. If you are easily offended you may not want to
come here."  If the writers of this bill would have listed that as a requirement
there would have been no trouble.
     Here is the way I look at it. I think that some things should be
censored on the Internet. Child pornography, for instance, is already illegal,
so it follows that it should also be illegal on the Internet. Besides,
psychologically, it damages the children involved.
     Something else that should be banned from the Internet are "hacker"
programs meant to harm other Internet users. Some examples of such programs are
AOHell which can give you access to America On-line for free and E-mail Bomb, or
otherwise harass others using the service (American On-line just passed a bill
that gave them the right to allow users to let them scan their mail for such
harmful things.)  Another thing that could be banned are text files which
describe how to complete illegal actions, such as make bombs.  The most famous
is the "Anarchist Cook Book," which shows Internet users some of the above
problems.
     I also believe that the use of log-ins, passwords, and rating systems on
pages for the Internet are a good idea, and are not violations of our civil
rights. They simply allow the user to choose what they want to see. Some of
these systems are already in use today, along with programs that watch for
obscene and profane keywords, and links to pornographic sites.
     What have Int...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Digital Term Papers. Please register below now!

Digital Term Papers has over 63,000 essays, term papers, and book notes online. Many paper sites will charge you hundreds of dollars for a single paper. Digital Term Papers only charges $14.95 for a one month membership with instant account activation!

Don't waste anymore time! Join NOW!!!

1 Month (automatic renewal) ($14.95)
3 Months (automatic renewal) ($29.95)
6 Months (one-time billing) ($39.95)

Pay by: